le Roux CW, Steen O, Lucas KJ, Startseva E, Unseld A, Hussain SA, Hennige AM.
Year of publication
2025
Publication/Journal
Diabetes Obes Metab
Volume
Issue
Pages
Abstract
Aim: To explore the effects of sex and baseline body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy and safety of survodutide in people with a BMI ≥27 kg/m2.
Materials and methods: Totally 387 people (aged 18-75 years, BMI ≥27 kg/m2, without diabetes) were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to once-weekly subcutaneous survodutide (0.6, 2.4, 3.6 or 4.8 mg) or placebo for 46 weeks (20-week dose escalation; 26-week dose maintenance). Participants were categorized according to sex and baseline BMI. Data were analysed descriptively for the full analysis set (FAS), according to dose assigned at randomization (planned treatment) using on-treatment data or all data censored for COVID-19-related treatment discontinuations. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04667377).
Results: After 46 weeks of survodutide treatment, females had greater reductions in bodyweight and waist circumference than males. Participants with a lower baseline BMI had greater proportional reductions in bodyweight than those with a higher baseline BMI; the trend was reversed for reductions in waist circumference. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were comparable between subgroups for sex and baseline BMI. Nausea was the most frequently reported gastrointestinal AE in all subgroups.
Conclusions: In people with a BMI ≥27 kg/m2, survodutide was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in bodyweight and waist circumference when compared with placebo, in prespecified subgroups based on sex and baseline BMI, and was tolerated at all doses tested.